Category Archives: Newspapers

1886 Free Press

Posted on by

February 28th  – Claim for Wages

Thomas Jones (who did not appear) was summoned for no-payment of £1 12s 6d money alleged to be due to George Church of Goytrey, for work done. The time elapsing between the service of the summons and the court day not being sufficient, the case was adjourned to allow of the defendant being summoned again.

March 5th
For sale, Tartarian seed oats – apply to Mr John Jenkins, Farm Bailiff, Goytrey.

March 12th

A very successful entertainment (the second since Christmas) was held at Saron Baptist Chapel, o Thursday evening the 4th inst., when the following programme was very efficiently rendered:- Prayers; anthem by the choir; recitation, Charles Evans; song, Mrs Evans; recitation, Annie Jones; recitation Eva Edmunds; quartet, Miss Carpenter and party; recitation, John Edmunds; recitation, Willie Evans; anthem, Choir; recitation, Polly Williams; recitation, Willie Francis; song, Miss Morgan; recitation, Ellen Davies; recitation, James Edmunds; song, Miss Carpenter; recitation, Annie Jones; anthem, Choir; recitation, Eva Edmunds; quartet, Miss Carpenter and party; song, Mrs Evans; anthem, Choir; The accompaniments were Miss Carpenter and Mr Wilks, jun. Despite the severity of the weather, the chapel was well filled and a very enjoyable evening was spent. The performance reflected on the teachers and scholars of the Sunday school, which is now i a flourishing condition. A good collection was made towards the funds. The meeting was presided over by the pastor, the Revd. W. G. Vaughan.

April 2nd

On Monday evening a concert was held in the Goytrey British School, when, notwithstanding the unfavourable state of the weather, the room was fairly well filled. Col. Byrde occupied the chair. Although the programme was unusually long, the interest of the audience was kept up throughout. The performers acquitted themselves admirably and the committee feel deeply obliged to them for their kind services.

The concert consisted of glees by the Goytrey choir, and duets in which the following ladies and gentlemen took part:- The Misses Hunt; Henry Williams, Pontypool; Redfero and Collier, the Rev. C H Cook, Messrs Lawrence, Hill, W Byrde, Wilks, Walkley, G. Meyrick and Eos Ondu.

A little variety was caused by a humorous dialogue by Miss R Wilks and party; and amusing recitation by Miss L Evans; and a violin solo by Mr England. The accompanists for the evening were Mrs Alexander, Miss A Byrde, Messrs Lawrence, England and J Wilks. The choir was ably conducted by Mr. W Wilks.

April 9th

On Monday last, an inquest was held at the Old Stores Goytrey by Mr E. D. Batt, coroner, respecting the deaths of David and Elizabeth, the infant children of Thomas Morgan, roadsman of Goytrey. The children were twins and died suddenly on the 4th inst., one having lived 28 and the other 49 hours. A verdict of “prematurely born” was returned by the jury.

April 16th – Affiliation Case

Thomas Roberts, Penystair Farm, Goytrey, was summoned to show why he should not pay towards the support of the illegitimate child of Ann Neate, of which he was alleged to be the father. It appeared that the complainant lived at Elm Tree Cottage, Goytrey, about half a mile from the residence of the defendant, who is an elderly married man. The complainant stated that he had promised to contribute towards the child’s maintenance, and had offered her £20 if she would go to a place in Newport which he would procure for her, so no one should know where she was. He gave her 5s to provide clothing for the child, and on the night of her confinement gave her half a pint of whiskey, at the same time promising to bring her some brandy the next time he went to Newport.

The defendant was her brother-in-law. The defendant called his wife, Martha Roberts, who proved that on May 15th last (a day on which the complainant alleged he was in her company) she and her husband went with their family to Abergavenny to see a daughter who was in the asylum. Defendant did not get out of the cart either coming or going. – The bench dismissed the case for want of corroborative evidence; but the complainant was given to understand that, if she could summon fresh witnessess to her aid she was at liberty to make a second application to the court.

April 30th

On Thursday week the mortal remains of the Rev. Thomas Evans who had been for about forty years the esteemed rector of the parish, were interred in the church, which was suitable draped in black cloth for the melancholy occasion. Though the funeral was a strictly private one, the sacred edifice was filled by the sorrowing parishioners, who desired to pay their last tribute of respect to the memory of their departed rector.

The service, which was fully choral, was conducted by the Rev. P. Powell, Mr W.H. Haskins of Pontypool, officiating as the organist.

The chief mourners were Mrs Evans, the Misses Evans and Dr. French. The coffin was covered with numerous choice wreaths. The funeral arrangements, which were efficiently carried out, were trusted to Mr E. Fowler of Pontypool, who was assisted by Mr T.H. Lewis and Mr H. Evans, builder.

June 11th – Rate Case

John Rosser (who did not appear) was summoned for non-payment of £1 19s 71/2 poor rates due to the overseers of Goytrey. Mr Gwatkin, assistant overseer, proved the case. The bench made an order of payment of £1 in a month, the remainder to be remitted.

July 23rd  – School Attendance Cases

Joseph Williams, of Goytrey (whose wife appeared) was summoned for not sending his child to school, Mr R. Derrett gave evidence, an order already having been made on the defendant, he was now directed to pay the costs 5s and to send the child regularly in future.

William Prosser of Goytrey was similarly summoned; the usual order being made.

James Rosser (no appearance) and Mary Watkins, both of Goytrey were also summoned in respect of the non-attendance at school of their children. – Having been ordered to send their children previously, they were now fined 5s each.

August 27th – Before the Rev J.C. Llewellin – Orchard Robbers

John Powell and William Reed of Abersychan were charged with stealing a quantity of pears the property of Richard Hewlett, at Goytrey on Sunday. – PC Davies said that, in consequence of complaints he and prosecutor were watching at 3 o’clock on Sunday morning in one of the orchards some distance from the house. They saw the prisoners, with three other men come out of the orchard and go into another orchard. In about an hour’s time they came out with a quantity of small pears in their possession which were identified by prosecutor as his property. –

Prosecutor gave corroborative evidence and stated that he had suffered great loss on the past three Sundays by gangs of men pillaging the orchards and damaging the trees. – Prisoners said they had picked up pears on the road.

Superintendant Whitfield said Reed had been twice previously before the court. Prisoners were fined 10s each or 7 days hard labour, and were warned that if they were again brought before the Bench they would be more severely punished.

October 15th – Non-payment of poor rate

Thomas Roberts, farmer Goytrey, was summoned for non-payment of £3 6s 3d, arrears of poor rates due to the overseers of the parish of Goytrey. – Defendant was represented by his wife, who stated that she only disputed certain arrears amounting to 19s 8d, the property in respect of which was levied having been assessed at £8 per annum when the rental was only £6. – The assistant overseer said the defendant occupied two premises in Goytrey and one of these, it is true, had been too highly assessed; therefore he did not press for payment of the sum of 19s 8d which was disputed, being content with an order for the balance. – The Bench made an order for payment of £2 6s 7d in a fortnight.

James Rosser (no appearance) was summoned for non-payment of £2 6s 7d, poor rates due to the overseers of the parish of Goytrey. – An order for payment was made.

Alfred Adams – Accident 1928

Posted on by

14th September 1928 – Accident

Mr Alfred George Adams of Cwmbran was riding a bicycle which pulled out in front of a motorcycle ridden by Mr Harold Francis Powell of Pengroesoped.

Mr Adams was thrown from the road into a lorry which ran over his stomach, he is seriously ill in hospital.

Elizabeth Lewis – An Amazonian Damsel 1865

Posted on by

1st April 1865 – An Amazonian Damsel

Elizabeth Lewis appeared, at the insistence of William Williams, charged with having assaulted him on Friday week at Goytrey.

Mr Alexander Edwards appeared for complainant. Complainant said on Friday week I was ordered to go and plough in a field that belonged to Mr Morgan, when defendant stopped me, and asked me where I was going, and I told her. She then turned the horses right about and asked me if I was going back. I said ‘no,’ then she seized a broomstick and struck me several severe blows on the shoulder, which was much injured. I then went back.

From an explanation given by Mr John Morgan, it appeared the land belonged to him. He had taken possession of it on the 2nd February, at which time the notice had expired for defendants husband to give up possession, and he did so.

There had been a conversation about the outgoing tenant re-taking the land, on the condition that his son would guarantee the payment of the rent; but as he refused to do so the matter dropped.

It was further given in evidence that defendant subsequently renewed her objections to the man ploughing the field, and p.c. Hall said when he went to serve defendant with the summons, she threatened to split complainants head open.

In answer to the bench the latter said, I am afraid of this woman if I go there again.. After Maria Lewis, the defendant’s daughter had given some unimportant evidence, the bench ordered the defendant to find sureties to keep the peace herself in sum of £20, and one bondman in £10, and pay expenses.

The decision did not seem to meet with defendant’s approbation; and it was not until it seemed that far from unlikely that she would be sent to prison, that a bondsman was procured.

Isaac Jeremiah – Apples and Eggs 1866

Posted on by

24th November 1866 – Apples v Eggs

A young lad named Isaac Jeremiah appeared at the instance of a man called Jones for stealing his apples. The parties reside at Goytrey, Jones had some apples on a barn floor and on looking through a crevice in the door he saw the lad putting some of them in a basket. On speaking to him he put them back whence he had taken them. Mrs Jeremiah said she had some hens laying in the barn, of which they were tenants until the month of May next year and she sent her son with a basket (produced) to gather the eggs. Jones said that the last witness had three hens laying in the barn. The bench said that although the lad might have been sent to look for eggs, yet he might have taken an apple or two. Case dismissed; complainant to pay 6s. 6sd costs.

Redvers Prosser – Cycle Accident 1924

Posted on by

Friday 24th September – CYCLE ACCIDENT AT GOYTREY – GRIFFITHSTOWN CLERKS NARRROW ESCAPE

An Alarming accident which might have proved fatal befell Mr Redvers Prosser of Goytrey on Wednesday morning. Mr Prosser who resides at Canal House was proceeding on his push bike to Griffithstown [where is employed in the clerical department at Messrs Baldwin’s works] when he collided with a motor vehicle at the dangerous corner near the Carpenters Arms.

He was conveyed to his home where it was ascertained that he was suffering from severe bruises and shock. Mr Prosser is well known in Goytrey as an active playing member of the local Association Football team.

Reference was made recently in the ‘Free Press’ to this corner as a potential death-trap.

Rector’s Reply 1866

Posted on by

Free Press December 22 1866

THE RECTOR OF GOYTREYS REPLY TO COLONEL BYRDES LETTER

23 Half-Moon street, Piccadilly, Dec 13th 1866.

To the Editor of the Free Press

Sir,- Before I left home this week, I observe red in your paper of Saturday last, an attack upon me in a letter addressed by col. Byrde to the Usk Highway Board. I feel obliged to your correspondent, who, it appears was present at the last meeting of that body, when the letter was read, for having procured a copy of it. But for this, to one fortunate circumstance, I should have remained in entire ignorance of the entire burden of that communication, which, doubtless, the writer had no idea when penning it, would ever have found its way to the Press, to give the assailed party an opportunity of repudiating his undeserved attack, and of showing to the public that the dissatisfaction stated by me to exist in the upper part of my parish, respecting the gates on the Penystair road is real, and that, consequently, the representation to the Board is not only calculated to mislead, but (of course from ignorance of the case) wholly inconsistent with the fact. When, owing to the chance of proper grounds and reasons, argument fails, abuse is convenient, and often resorted to.

I had no idea of interfering with the Penystair road question, although long aware of discontent about it, until I accidentally saw the surveyor, some time ago, near my church, when two of my parishioners, the one a freeholder, and the other a leaseholder in Bwrgwm, were having an excited conversation with him about road matters, and also about the three gates put up by col. Byrde on the Penystair road. We represented to the Surveyor that it was illegal, and a positive injustice to the owners and occupiers of land on the side of the hill in Goytrey and Llanover, to allow these gates to remain on a parish road.

He observed that he could do nothing in the matter when a complaint was made – and suggested that one of the two more particularly interested, should write to the Board or to him, and formally complain of the objection. Some hesitation being, however, felt by my two parishioners in reference to the task of writing to the Board, I offered to write for them. Hence “the Rector’s championship,” volunteered in a matter so evidently disinterested to Col. Byrde.

I can truly say, I hope that whatever the Rector sees the attempt of might to overcome right, he will never be wanting in his duty to his parishioners to maintain their ancient and just right to all parish thoroughfares.

I distinctly remember the conversation at a parish meeting on the subject of putting gates on the road, and I well remember the caution, on the part of the few present, with which Col. Byrde’s wishes were received and the entire absence of response to those wishes. He thus tells the Board – “Nor can I believe there has been ‘the complaint or dissatisfaction’ represented that the gates in question have been allowed to remain, for though I have personally spoken of them to many in the parish, I never heard one single word of objection expressed to their existence.”

I distinctly remember a parishioner, who had always felt aggrieved on the point, expressing to him his dissatisfaction and objection, and also the dissatisfaction felt by others in the upper part of the parish, that gates had been put on the road. – and, surely, Col. Byrde’s memory must be exceedingly defective if he does not recollect when at a parish meeting he was much annoyed at having been told, in my hearing, by one of the farmers, in alluding to interference with the road in question, that “it was a monopoly.”

I never said to col. Byrde that this road was useless. I could not say so with truth – but could and might have said that it was “comparatively useless” – like two other roads in Bwrgwm.

Since such road are occasionally used they cannot with justice to the public be shut up, or so interfered with as to have gates put on them. A few sheep may, perchance, stray along the roads and get into Penystair fields, but where the “young cattle and donkeys” are to come from I am unable to conceive. But col. Byrde has no more reason to complain than others on this head. Has no the lord of the manor provided for such an evil? Has he not put a good gate on top of the main lane leading to the mountain in order to prevent sheep coming down? And if they should jump the gate, has he not provided for each parish a pound in which they can easily be lodged? Farmers on the hill side are not in the habit of taking the law into their own hands by putting gates on the adjacent roads, and thus infringing public rights, but trust to the mountain gate, or have recourse to the pound. Why should not Col. Byrde be satisfied with the same manorial provisions and keep his fences in good order? It is well known in Goytrey that a parish road cannot legally be shut up except by Court of Quarter Sessions – and, I believe, that Court cannot do it – if there should be an objection raised by a landowner who is interested in such a road – unless a better and, in all respects, and to all parties, a more convenient one is made with a view to supersede it. But let a landowner pull down one fence along a parish road and put up a few gates at certain distances, and in no time let him put up Notices at each end to this effect:: “any one found trespassing on these lands will be prosecuted, “ the parish road is then practically lost to the public. There might still remain to tell the tale, a pathway where the old lane was, but who would venture to send his young stock to market through what he is forced to regard as the property of a gentleman rising in the neighbourhood?

Now for the extraordinary proofs given that the road is of no use.

  1. Col. Byrde says, “Anyone going from Llanover to the upper part of the parish would not go out of his way to choose this lane when he had a more direct and better route up the Bwrgwm road.”   Of course not – it would be absurd in him to do so., unless he wishes to have a very fine view of the surrounding country. But any one going from Rhyd-y-llwyfen, and the region beyond, in the upper part of Llanover, with young cattle or sheep, towards Mamhilad, or to Usk, or to Pontypool markets, would he not go along the Penystair road rather than round by Pencroshopped, and then along the turnpike road, and, thus, much increase his distance?
  2. The following is the second proof that the road in question is of no use. “Any one going from Llanover to Pontypool would unsurely not go so far from the main road which invites them in preference.” Certainly, not unless the person were after the Llangibby or the Monmouthshire hounds, and wished to take that direction, in which case, the Penystair road would be very serviceable in saving the fields of the neighbouring farmers.
  3. The third and last proof is the following – “Even anyone going to Pantyscan farm, which also belongs to me, would go up the lane by New Barn or the Bwrgwm road.” Let those acquainted with the locality judge whether there is any proof of the uselessness of the road in questioning this remark. Any one going from Newbarn or from the Cwm in Mamhilad, to Bwrgwm in Goytrey, would take this road as his direct and nearest way. Such are the proofs!

Now for a “detail of a few facts connected with the road to show how far credence is to be given to my representation.” Destroy the Rector’s credibility as a witness, and his testimony is of no value.

1.Col Byrde tells the Board that he has a tolerably distinct recollection of that lane at various periods for 35 years, and it never was in different condition to what it is now, overgrown, dilapidated, and unused.”

He has forgotten to add that he has spent about 25 years out of the 35 out of the country. The road during my incumbency of about 24 years has never has never been so neglected as it is now. Before the farms referred to were bought for Col. Byrde a few years back, the road was in a better condition, notwithstanding the heavy hauling of stones along it from the Penystair quarry for the rebuilding of Goytrey church- for the erection of my school-room and teacher’s residence and for the making of various railway bridges.

  1. The second fact is – “There never were within my recollection any fences other than at present., along the fields of the Penystair and Pentrebach farms, adjoining that lane.”

I can only say that last Monday I walked the whole of the lane myself and found fully 180 yards of the fence pulled down, entirely cleared away, and converted into arable or meadow land. Col. Byrde can hardly be aware of this, for he tells the Board that “it is not true that the lane has been partially taken into his land.” He also says that “the gates are always open.” If so, what is the use of them? I found the three shut, and between the second and the third, three hurdles placed across the road which I had to get over.

  1. The third fact adduced is – “I have never seen during my residence at Goytrey either a horse or mule, or ass travelling that lane that I can recall to my own remembrance.” Col. Byrde will surely admit that those who have regularly resided, from year to year, in the parish, during his long absence of about 25 years in India, must have seen traffic along the road – such as carrying lime from the mountain in Llanover to Newbarn, to Upper Goytrey House, and to farms in Mamhilad, to say nothing of the fact that farmers from the said farm used, in former years, to send their young cattle along the Penystair road to their coedoa, or rough pasture on the hill-side in Llanover.
  2. The fourth fact is – “Neither have I met with any parishioner who can remember any parish outlay on this old road.”

Col. Byrde has certainly taken no pains to ascertain this point. For any old ratepayer who has attended, for some years, parish meetings would at once set him right. Neither has he taken much, if an, trouble, to consult the Parish Books, to see whether any entries have been made, from time to time, o fpayment of labour on this undoubtedly parish road. The Parish books, which I have examined, would convince any one on this point, and also show that the sums expended on it, at distinct intervals, and explicitly entered, have been very trifling. Besides, this road has, within my recollection and at my suggestion, been repaired by the parish.

In conclusion, I will observe that, however plausibly it may be insinuated that I was actuated by unworthy feelings in addressing the Surveyor, and not by a disinterested desire to maintain parish rights, the several members of the Board, at their last meeting, had before them the fact, that others had remonstrated with that body against the continuance of the gate s, and the damage done by Col. Byrde to the Penystair road – which was a complete refutation of all his insinuations.

Having, I think, convincingly replied to the various particulars to the Highway Board, the readers of the Press can now judge whether I have not fully shown that there is another side to the Penystair-road question, whereby is verified a saying of old, as it is true –

“One tale is good until another is told.”

I shall feel obliged, Mr Editor, by your kindly inserting this letter – and, I remain,

Yours truly, THOMAS EVANS, Rector of Goytrey

1867 Free Press

Posted on by

February 16th – Thomas Watts v Thomas Jeremiah

This was an action brought to recover from the defendant, a contractor, living at Mamhilad, the sum of £2, being the value of some chains belonging to a timber carriage, purchased by the defendants off plaintiff’s mother.
The case was adjourned at the previous court, for the purpose of enabling defendant to call as a witness the man to whom the chains were delivered by plaintiff, who contended that he agreed to sell chains to defendant, who, on the other hand, contended that when he purchased the timber carriage, he purchased all belonging to it, and the chains were an appendage to the carriage.
Mr E B Edwards appeared for the defendant and called:
Mr Henry Crump, who said, I was in the employ of Mr Jeremiah, he sent me to Watts for some chains, I went and asked him for them, and they were delivered to me. There was nothing said about paying for them, I took them to Mr Jeremiah.
Plaintiff: I let the man have the chains on condition Mr Jeremiah and I agreed upon.
His Honour: It now rests with me the which of the two I shall believe, and unfortunately for you, you have been convicted of felony.
Plaintiff: There are many others besides myself.
His Honour: Yes, but it goes against a person when he comes into court, and in this case I cannot give you a verdict.
Plaintiff: Then I shall get nothing for the chains?
His Honour: No.
Plaintiff: Then I think it is not justice.
His Honour: You may think it is not. I do not say that I am right. You may have told the truth – and he an un-truth, perhaps it is so; but when two persons come into court and swear quite the reverse to each other, I prefer the statement of the man whose character is beyond reproach to that of a man who has been convicted of felony. I may be wrong. Possibly I am.

(Thomas Watts indicted for the manslaughter of Thomas Morris October 1846)

June 8th – Paying Dear for his Watercress

Charles Jenkins was charged with assaulting Charles Jenkins at Mamhilad on the 25th ult.
The complainant, it appeared was greatly afflicted, and on the day named his sister saw the defendant coming over the hedge of their meadow, in which watercress were very plentiful.
They never objected to any person picking the watercress if they asked permission to do so. When complainant spoke to the defendant about breaking the hedge, the latter struck him and told him to go home.
The chairman told the defendant that he not only broke their hedges but that he defied them on their own land.
He would have to pay a fine of 20s.

June 29th – Monmouthshire

To be sold by Auction
by Mr J Graham, jun
at the Golden Lion Inn Usk
on Friday July 6th 1867 at two o’ clock
The Following Desirable Freehold Property
In two lots viz:

Lot 1.

Cottage and Garden and Three Pieces of Arable Land, situate in the parish of Goytrey and containing by estimation 3a 1r 31p
Now in the occupation of William Bevan as yearly tenant
This lot adjoins the road leading from Chain Bridge to Penpellenny
And the lands of John Logan esq.,

Waddington & Gustard, solicitors, Usk

August 3rd – Assault

Thomas Roberts was charged on remand with an assault on Lucy Mercy on the 13th inst., at Goytrey.
Mr Alex Edwards appeared for the defendant.
Lucy Mercy was again examined; her evidence was given last week; she now stated that on Wednesday deft. came with a stick and swore he would kill her.
Cross-examined: did you not walk up to him first?
No, sir.
Did you not say anything to him before he came up to you?
Not a sentence, sir.
Did you not say, “I’ll spoil your face before you get married”
No sir, I did not.
Was anybody near at the time?
Martha Davies and my niece were five yards from me.
Did they see all that was passing?
Yes.
Are you quite certain?
Yes, sir.
Did you speak to Martha Davies before you went up the road?
Yes.
What did you say to her then?
Nothing, I only asked her if she knew her brother was in prison and she said no.
Did you tell her anything about your daughter?
No.
Not that she was to be married that morning?
No.
That you would have the clothes off her back?
No.
That you would stop it?
No.
Did you make any threats about her?
No, not on that day, or just before I went up the road.
Elizabeth Watkins, niece of the complainant was sworn. Her evidence was the same as given by her last examination. It will be remembered that she then stated she was close by them, and saw the commencement of the assault.

Martha Davies said she kept house for her father in Goytrey. A fortnight that morning she was at the top of the cross-roads. She saw Lucy Mercy and Elizabeth Watkins, some conversation passed between them, and Lucy went up the road. Did not see commencement of the row. No one could have witnessed it. Elizabeth Watkins said to me “I bet sixpence there will be a row,” I heard Thomas Robert’s tongue, and Lucy screamed. I stood on the road, I did not see defendant before the assault began. I saw Thomas “scuffing” Lucy Mercy off the ground by the back, and then she went up the road, they were both down, I could barely tell in what position. I only saw the man and woman “scuffling” but not a blow struck.

Mr Alexander Edwards: Complainant went up on purpose to have a row. Defendant admits striking a blow but only in self-defence.

Elizabeth Watkins re-called by the bench: she has been to defendant’s house several times.

Mr Alexander Edwards: You are the niece, are you not, of the complainant?
Yes, sir.
The other witness is no relation?
No, sir.
James Morgan said that on the morning in question he was coming from Nantyderry and heard the women screaming. He spoke to two men about it, saying that defendant was going to be married, and had been beating his mother-in-law that morning. When defendant was told of it he said “D….. her eyes, I will break her neck”
A witness named Martha Roberts was called, but as she was present at the assault, her evidence was not taken.
Mr Alexander Edwards said that defendant had been insulted and badgered by complainant for a long time.
The Bench: we have no doubt complainant gave you some considerable provocation, not only at that time, but for those many months. You have no excuse on any occasion to strike a woman, or, in fact to strike anybody. We do not want to be very severe with you in this case, you will have to pay a fine of 10s at 14 days.
Defendant: I would rather take it to a further court.

December 14th – “Hisht, Thomas”

Thomas Watkins was summoned by Thomas Roberts for leaving work on 30th November, before expiration of the contract into which he had entered.
Complainant is a timber haulier and beer-house keeper at Goytrey, and defendant was a simple looking countryman, who, it appears, was looking for a job of work, and met complainant who wanted “a smart young man” to look after his horses and cart.
Defendant has worked for complainant last year, it seemed, but appeared to have left, as complainant wished him to go out and help him to steal fodder for the horses.
This assertion would have dumbfounded most people, but Mr Roberts, with a smile of conscious innocence, looked towards the representatives of the press and said, “never mind about that Thomas; you don’t report these things here.”
The parties appeared to have come to an understanding, for the day after they met defendant complainant’s service at 5s a week, with board and lodging.
Defendant, while admitting the terms, said he only meant it for the day; to which complainant replied persuadably, “by the week, Thomas; by the week, it’s no use you saying that, why did you work a day at all Thomas? It’s no use Thomas being nasty.”
Defendant now said that when he worked for complainant before he was not properly paid: and that it couldn’t be expected that a wife and family could be supported on 5s a week: to which complainant replied “Well, Thomas, you supported your family before.”
Complainant seemed to think that he had been wronged, for on Thomas stating his grievances he said, “Well, it’s no use of you Thomas saying that: you left the carriages in one place, and the materials in another. Hisht Thomas!
The clerk: will you go back to work for a week?
Defendant: No, sir.
The clerk: then you will have to go to jail.
Defendant: no sir, I will not go with a man of that sort.
Complainant: it is very likely you would say that Thomas.
Defendant: I never had anything before my character before this.
Complainant: it’s no disgrace to you Thomas.
Defendant: I suppose you thought you would get somebody else to go with you?
Complainant: no Thomas.
The patronising way in which complainant “Thomas’d” defendant at every sentence caused some amusement in the court.
The Bench, considering that some arrangement had been entered into, ordered defendant to pay 6s.
Defendant: no I won’t.
The clerk: pay the 6s and have done with it.
Defendant: no, no.
The clerk: don’t be foolish.
Defendant: (obstinately) no I won’t, he wants me to do some thieving with him all the time.
Defendant seemed to think he would have to go back to work on paying the money, and evidently preferred going to prison to having anything more to do with complainant, and this idea seeming to please him, he consented to her paying the money for him, and left the dock remarking “very well, I can summon you up for a good lot.”

December 23rd – Stealing Lead

James Morgan, who described himself as a labourer, was charged with stealing 45lbs of lead, the property of James James, Mamhilad on the 17th inst.
Pc Burden proved finding the lead at Smith’s marine store on Wednesday morning.
Sarah Smith, of the marine store, proved buying the lead from prisoner on Tuesday afternoon for 5s 6d.
Prisoner said he lived at Goytrey and gave the name William Thomas for entry in her book. The entry was made at the time of purchase.
Prisoner denied giving witness a false name.
Alfred Compton said he met prisoner at the Three Horseshoes on the Abergavenny road, on Tuesday morning. After some conversation witness agreed to take some lead in a cart to Pontypool.
Prisoner got over into a field and brought the lead from the “Old Oak” by a farm on the left hand side going to Abergavenny. When they got to George Street prisoner left him, taking the lead with him.
James James, the prosecutor said that he missed the lead last Tuesday from his back premises where it had been used as a shelter for some beehives, and where he had seen it on the previous Monday.
Prisoner asked this witness a few questions as to his sobriety on the day the lead was taken: whether he could swear to the lead &c, and finished by saying that he had stabbed his daughter with a knife.
It appeared however, that the prisoner had been in jail for stabbing a man, or by hitting him with a pike. He had at first denied taking the lead, but now pleaded guilty to save going to the sessions, and was sentenced to two months hard labour.

1905 Free Press

Posted on by

Friday May 12th 1905

Fern bedding for sale 10s gambo load delivered – apply L. Morgan, Pentre Farm, Goytrey, near Pontypool.

Vestry – At St Peter’s vestry meeting the rector [Rev Joshua Davies] presided. The accounts were adopted and showed a balance in hand of over £35. It was stated that the communicants on Easter day numbered 101. The rector nominated Mr E. M. Bird the Pentre as his warden, and the parishioners elected Mr E.W. Gwatkin, Goytrey Wharf.

Friday July 7th 1905

Modern, attractive Villa Residence for sale, Heathfield, Nantyderry:

Good supply of water, garden, orchard, lawn, near river Usk, post, telegraph office and church – apply by letter to Edwin Richards, Nantyderry, near Abergavenny.

Monmouthshire, parishes of Goytrey and Trostrey, Marfell & Poole offer for sale Saturday July 15th 1905:

Lot 1: All that desirable freehold farm known as the “Yew Tree” situate in the parish of Goytrey, containing 14a 0r 14p of pasture land with convenient house and buildings in good state of repair, now in the occupation of Mr Merrick Jenkins, as yearly tenant at a rental of £24 per annum.

Friday November 3rd 1905

Name Not Painted

William Lewis, farmer, Nantyderry was fined 5s for using a wagon on the highway without name and address painted theron, at Panteg and Pontypool on Oct. 20th – PC Bevan said the name was written in chalk on the waggon.

Without Lights

Henry Knipe, farmer was fined 5s for driving a horse and trap without lights at Mamhilad on the 19th October. PC Nunley said at 11.30 pm on the Usk Road he saw defendant driving with only 1 light – The Clerk: I suppose the Goytre Farmers’ Dinner lasted a little longer than you expected Mr Knipe?

Friday November 10th 1905

Goytrey – To Let: Six roomed house with usual offices; convenient and cheap:

Apply

  1. Jenkins, Yew Tree, Goytrey.

Friday November 17th 1905

Black Beech Farm Goytrey,

4 miles from Usk and Pontypool, 1 mile from Nantyderry Station.

Marfell & Poole have been favoured with instruction from Mr T(homas) H Rees (who is relinquishing farming pursuits) to sell by auction on the premises as above on Thursday November 30th 1905, the whole of his Live and dead farming stock comprising:

18 cross bred and Hereford cattle viz: 3 dairy cows to calve in good season, 1 barren, 10 yearling steers and heifers, 4 calves:

21 stock ewes, 1 ram lamb, 2 oxford down, ditto:

9 cart and nag horses and colts, including cart mare 5 years, nag mare 6 years, cart horse aged ditto, yearling colt, 3 year old cob, 3 years old cart filly, ditto colt, sucker:

35 Turkeys, 70 Fowls:

Produce: Rick of hay about 10 tons, a quantity of sweedes and mangolds, 1 ton potatoes:

Implements include nearly new binder by Harrison and McGregor, wheel plough by Hornsby, bouting plough, 3 sets of iron harrows, scufflers, horse hoe, shearing machine, chaff machine and horse works, pulper, Bambury new cart, milk trap, market trap, phaeton, mowing machine, manual reaper, rick cloth, horse rake, corn drill, knife grinder and stand, wheel barrow, casks and tubs, long go and trap harness, sundry tools & c.

Luncheon at 11.30 – sale at 12.30 prompt

Auctioneers Office: The Willows, Usk.

Friday October 27th 1905

Goytrey & District Farmers Association: Successful show at Pentwyn:

The twelfth annual meeting of the above association was held on Thursday October 19th 1905 at the Pentwyn Farm, Mamhilad, kindly lent by Mr W. Jenkins.

The day was marked with cold fine weather, and a fair number of visitors were present at different portions of the day. The competitions in ploughing and hedging aroused not a little interest, and the standard reached by the competitors was as high as it was promising. The exhibits were also on a par with past shows and the horses, although not numerous were of the right quality. Pigs were few, but the few were all good ones, and would be difficult to beat. A nice display of poultry shewed that in this direction local farmers are paying special attention to catering for the public.

Though practically a young society, it has the right men at the head, and with improvements in certain directions there is no reason why the annual show should not become more popular in future years.

The chairman of the committee for the present year is Mr Henry Knipe, and the society still retains the valuable services of Mr W. Evans as secretary. (E.R. there was a William Evans at Thatch Cott Pengroesoped)

The judges were as follows:

Ploughing: Messrs D. Evans Tremynach Farm Raglan, and Allen James Treveddu Pandy:

Horses: Messrs T. Morgan Chatterton Blaenavon, and Evan Williams Victoria Hotel, Barry Dock.

Roots, Ricks and Clover: Messrs Peter Marfell, Cwm Clytha and W. Morgan David, Llansantfraid.

Hedging Messrs David Lewis, Gwehelog and T.(homas) Jones, Llwyncelyn, Goytre.

Pigs: Mr J. Davies, Pontypool.

Poultry: Messrs J. Knapp, Pontypool, and Mr J. Hobbs, Usk.

Cottagers Gardens: Mr J(ohn). Harding, Nantyderry.

Annual Dinner

In the evening the annual dinner took place at the Carpenters Arms Penpwllenny, when a good number were excellently provided for by Mr A.E. Price and the Misses Price.

Mr H. D. Jones [agent for the Llanover Estate] presided.

The chairman, having proposed the loyal toasts submitted that of “The Bishop and Clergy and Ministers of all denominations.”

Mr. G.W. Gwatkin as a churchwarden responded.

Mt T. Sykes gave the “Army, Navy and Reserve Forces.”

Mr W. H. Charles) proposed “Success to Agriculture and the Goytre Farmers Association.” He had been engaged in agriculture from his childhood he said, and the industry called for unceasing labour and skill. Shows such as theirs that day did much to encourage agriculturalists – tenant farmers, their sons and employees – in their work and to take a keen interest in it.

Mr Henry Knipe, the veteran chairman of the committee said he had been associated with such societies for a great many years. His brother and he started the meeting at Llantarnam over 60 years ago and he was connected with it until he came to Goytre. He was very pleased to say that the Goytre Association was increasing in membership and in usefulness. Its influence had been marked by the improvement which had taken place in all departments of agriculture since its formation. [Applause.]

Mr Lewis [The Hendre, Llanover] gave “The Donors of Special Prizes and the Subscribers” in a speech appreciative of their kindness; he regretted they had not, as their president that evening, one of the landed proprietors of the district. He proposed the toast of those who gave their help, getting no other benefit other than the satisfaction of knowing they were doing good. [Applause.]

Mr Aymes said it was a pleasure to him to be able to give, and he should continue to do so as long as he was able.

Mr D (avid H). Morgan [The Wern] proposed “The President.” Mr Jones, he said was actively connected with agriculture as the agent of one of the largest landed proprietors of the district, the Trustees of the Llanover Estate, and, after all, farmers had more to do with the agents than the landlords. They were pleased to have Mr Jones in the chair. [Applause.]

The Chairman briefly returned thanks, remarking that is was, as they knew, that he occupied the chair that evening. He regretted that Mr Isaac George had been unable to come and take the position.

Mr J. Parker gave the “Judges,” who he said, were all good men of experience whose awards they would all accept.

Mr Peter Marfell replying, said the root judges had seen a splendid lot, the mangolds being especially good. Competition had been keen. There would have been a difference if some of the competitors had put their drills a little closer.

Mr Waters returned thanks and Mr Evans; another judge confessed that it was not as good as he had expected to see. A good week’s rain previously would have shewn better work. The open champion class was a very good one. The boys’ class was a very funny one to judge.

Mr E Parker submitted “The Vice-Chairman” and referred Mr E. Spencer’s work for the Association.

Mr Spencer, in response, said he had always been ready to do his duty in connection with the society. He strongly regretted the fact that, though five or six of the local landed proprietors had been asked to preside, not one could be found to accept the invitation. However Mr Jones had come to the rescue at the last moment, and he was a worthy man of whom they were proud.

“The successful competitors” was also proposed by Mr E. Parker, who read a letter of regret at being unable to be present from Mr R. St John Bessley of Usk, who also conveyed his best wishes for the success of the meeting.

“The Unsuccessful Competitors” was proposed by Mr Morgan and responded to by Mr Worgent and Mr Gwatkin.

Mr J. Parker gave “Mr & Mrs William Jenkins,” who had served them so well at Pentwyn Farm that day.

Mr Jenkins in reply, said that he had done his best for the Association and his sons had helped him, but he thought his wife had had the hardest work of all. [Hear hear!]

Other toasts were “The Press,” proposed by Mr A. R. Beynon and responded to on behalf of the “County Observer” and “The Host and his sisters,” given from the chair and acknowledged by Mr Price.

During the evening several songs were sung, Mr Jones of Pontypool giving a especial pleasure and amusement by his contributions. Among others who sang were Messrs Luffman, Franklyn Harris, G. Turner and – Lewis, Mr A.R. Beynon acted as accompanist.

The Awards

Ploughing:

Open Swing Class: Wm Whitney, Tycoch Farm

Wheel Plough – open to all comers: Amos Crump (Mr Hy Knipe]

District Champion Wheel Plough: 1. Edward Davies, Mamhilad; 2. George Mathews, [Mrs Turner Lanvair]

Farmers’ class or farmers’ sons; 1. Arthur Jenkins, Pentwyn; 3. – Nicholas, Mardy

Waggoners’ class: 1. – Harrison, [with Mr Geo Spencer,] 2. Mark Hinkerman [with Messrs Knipe Bros] 3. Dd Jones [with Llanover trustees]

Boys’ class, under 18 years; 1. Thomas Hardwicke, Wern, Goytre; 2.Ernest Bennett, Nantyderry; 3. Oswald Williams [with Mr Hopkins, Pentwyn:]

Best Digger; D Thomas, [with Mr A Jones]

Special Prize given by Mr H. Jenkins to the competitor who turned the farrows neatest – to be decided by the next meeting.

 

Horses and Turnout:

The neatest and cleanest turnout: 1. E. Nicholas, Mardy

Most valuable pair of horses: 1. W Beer, High Mead, Llanover; 2. [Prize given by Mr Amery, Pontypool] G. Spencer, Lanvair:

Cart Brood Mare: 1. + 2. W. Beer

Cart Sucker Colt or Filly: 1. E. Parker, Court Farm; 2. W. Beer; 3. E. Nicholas:

Nag Brood Mare: 1. W. Lewis, Lower Hendre; 2. J. Parker, Kemys;

Horse for Colliery Purposes: 1. [Prize given by Mr J. Parker], Wm Jenkins; 2. [Prize given by Mr H Knipe], Wm Jenkins;

Best Cob: 1. W. Lewis; 2. [Prize given by Mr Probyn, Pontypool], W. Pugh, Hendre; 3. [Prize given by Castle Brewery Co.], W. Pugh; 3. G. Spencer;

Two Year Old Cob: 1. W. Pugh; 2. A (lfred). Jones, Goytre House Farm; 3. C. Edwards, Lanvair:

Neatest trimmed tail on pair of horses: 1. E. Nicholas

Prize of £1 1s is given by Mr W. Lewis for the best foal insured by him: 1. E. Nicholas; 2. W. H. Charles, Park-y-brain.

 

Hedging

Champion prize: 1. Joseph Jones, Gwehelog; 2. Charles Jones, Llanbaddock; 3. James Meredith, Lanvair; and Wm. Howells, Gwehelog.

Ditching and hedging, [14 yards within 6 hours]: 1. Sidney Howells, Goverra Farm; 2. Geo Spencer, Lanvair; 3. J. Charles, Park-y-brain.

Farmers’ sons or servants’ class: [under 23 years of age] 1. Cornelius Morgan, Glanusk; 2. William Phillips, Lanvair.

 

Rick Making and Thatching

Best and neatest made rick [thatched on a farm, including tidiest rick-yard] 1. George Spencer; 2. William Morgan, Glanusk:

Prize of 10s to the boy, not exceeding 18 years of age who shall have made and thatched a rick of produce in the best and most workmanlike manner. Second prize of a hacker and hedging gloves [given by Messrs Sandbrook & Dawe, Pontypool] 1. Arthur Jenkins, Pentwyn; 2. W. Jenkins, Pentwyn; 3. 5s, Isaac Charles, Park-y-brain:

 

Roots

Two acres Swedes [Chemical Manure Co’s prize] 1. John Hopkins, Pentwyn; 2. George Spencer, White House, Lanvair:

Two acres Swedes [Norrington, Hington & Co’s prize] 1. George Spencer; 2. Wm. Lewis, Llanover:

Two acres Swedes [prize given by Messrs E.B. Ford & Sons, Pontypool] £2 2s, Mrs Turner, Lanvair:

Three acres mixed clover [prize given by E.B. Ford & Sons, £1 1s] W. Beer, Highmead, Lanvair:

Three acres of Swedes [prize by Saunders & Co., Abergavenny £2 2s]   D. Thomas, Chain Bridge, near Usk:

Three acres of clover [prize by Saunders & Co., £1 5s] W. Beer:

Two acres Swedes [prize by Odams, per Mr Morgan Griffiths, Raglan] George Spencer:

Swedish turnips [prize by Dutfield & Frost £2] Wm. Morgan:

Two acres Swedes [prize by J. Turner £2 2s] W. Knipe, Pentwyn:

Two acres Swedes [prize by W. Gough, Hereford] Wm. Jenkins, Pentwyn:

Two acres clover [prize by W. Gough] Wm. Jenkins:

 

Association Prizes

Best and cleanest three acres of Swedes: 1. George Spencer; 2. Mrs Turner; 3. W. Beer:

Best and cleanest two acres of Swedes: 1. William Morgan; 2. Thomas Morgan, Kemys;

  1. George Stinchcome, Goytre:

Best and cleanest acre of mangolds: 1. W. Beer; 2. John Hopkins; 3. W H Williams, Goverra Farm:

Best and cleanest half acre of mangolds: 1. & 2. George Spencer and George Thomas, Chain Bridge:

 

Poultry Produce etc.

Turkey: 1. Miss Charles, Park-y-brain; 2. Mrs A Jones, Goytre House Farm:

Goose: 1. Miss Evans, High House, Mamhilad; 2. Mrs A Jones:

Pair of Ducks: 1. Mrs R Jenkins, Velincoed; 2. Mrs A Jones:

Couple of Fowls: 1. Mrs R Jenkins; 2. Miss Evans:

Two lbs of butter: 1. Miss Parker, Kemys; 2. Mrs T Morgan, Kemys:

Three Cheeses: 1. Miss Parker; 2. Mrs Jenkins, Pentwyn:

Best Cottager’s Garden: 1. Harrison, [employed with George Spencer, Lanvair] 2. Edward Jenkins, Kemys; 3. George Jones, Goytre:

 

Pigs:

Fat Pigs: 1. &2. Wm Walker, Goytre: (E Reg Ty Hir)

Cottagers’ Class: 1. Mrs Morgan, Glan-y-nant:

Store Pigs: 1. & 2. William Walker:

Sow and pigs: [prize given by Mr John Davies, butcher, Pontypool] 1. John Parker, Kemys; 2. J Rees, Goytre Farm, Nantyderry:

 

Block Test

Nearest judging of the weight of a sheep: 1 & 2 divided between H. Stinchcombe, Monkswood and – Morgan, Govilion; both guessing the correct weight, 84lbs:

 

Farm Servants etc

Longest serving with a tenant farmer, member of the association; 1. Workman, [with Mr W Morgan, Glanusk] 61/2 years 2. David Thomas [with Mr A Jones, Goytre], 3 years:

Prize of 10s 6d to the female servant longest with the same employer 1. L Harris [with Mr Thomas, Chain Bridge] 7 years 5 months:

The prize of £5 for the best site for the ploughing matches was awarded to Mr W Jenkins, Pentwyn:

Police Court 1863

Posted on by

Free Press February 28 1863 – POLICE COURT

Thursday. – Before G. G. Relph, Esq.

Rebecca Powell charged with stealing a sovereign belonging to her master, Mr. T. Davies, farmer, Goytrey, was remanded until Saturday.

Free Press March 7 1863

LARCENY BY A FEMALE SERVANT- Adelaide Powell, a girl about sixteen years of age, was charged with having stolen £1, and one pair of boots, the money and property of her mistress, Mrs Ann Davies, of Goytrey ……. Prosecutor said that in September last the prisoner was in her employ, and on the 6th of that month had been sent to a shop in the neighbourhood for some goods, to pay for which she took a sovereign, and for the purpose of carrying them home had taken a bag.   The prisoner had not been to the shop where directed to go by her mistress, and never returned to her employment.   On the morning of the day in question, witness leant prisoner a pair of boots, with which she also absconded ……. Prisoner said she had accidentally lost the sovereign, which was entrusted to her by husband of witness, and that prosecutrix had given the boots to her ……. The Bench considered that there was no proof that the prisoner stole the sovereign, and for stealing the boots and bags they should sentenanced her to one month’s imprisonment with hard labour.

(Thomas and Ann Davies lived at Cerig Mawr)

Tea at Chapel Ed 1863

Posted on by

Free Press March 14 1863

GOYTREY – The temperance band of hope met at Penpelleny Cross at 3 p.m. on Tuesday, and formed in procession headed by their temperance band, and superintendent. In passing the smith’s shop they received not a few “good reports.” At Goytrey house they were most cheerfully welcomed by Col. And Lady Bird, and by a party of about 60, who had dined there. Having sung “Touch not the Cup,” they returned to Chapel Ed, to enjoy a treat of tea and cake, which was given to the members of the society. At 7 p.m., a temperance meeting was held, when addresses were delivered by the chairman, (Rev. D. Hargest,) Mr John Jenkins, and Mr John Ballard, and many interesting recitation, dialogues, &c., given, interspersed with appropriate singing. The meeting concluded with an addition of 27 “recruits.”

 

Good Friday! Good Friday!

ARE YOU COMING? – To where? For a country

trip on GOOD FRIDAY next, to

Chapel-Ed tea meeting, Goytrey.

TEA ON THE TABLE AT 2 P.M.

Single Fares from Pontypool to Nantyderry Station;

Thence, a beautiful 10 minutes’ walk through a grove.

Don’t forget

Tickets may be had of MISS JONES, Bristol

House, Pontnewynydd; MR THOMAS JONES, Grocer, &c.,

Sowhill, Pontypool; and MISS PROSSER, Caroline-st.

The Train will leave Nantyderry at 9 p.m., by which

You can return after the PUBLIC SERVICE.

 

Free Press April 11 1863

THE ANNUAL TEA MEETING AT CHAPEL-ED, Goytrey was celebrated on Good Friday, when an immense number of people were present. There were two services in the chapel during the day – morning and evening. At a cursory glance at the prospects of a tea party at the very small hamlet of Goytrey being fertile in the monetary bearing, one would naturally be inclined to predict an unfavourable issue, but when on takes into consideration that it has as its object a good cause, viz., the expansion of the funds of the chapel, and that Goytrey itself is surrounded on every side by picturesque scenery, – rivulets glittering like serpents in the sunshine or like threads of silver, and wooded heights gilded with the gleams of the sun where the fresh breezes blend with the carolling of the feathered tribe, – it is not, then, to be wondered at that such a large number of people availed themselves of the opportunity of visiting the sparsely populated hamlet on this occasion. The grave-yard of the chapel in which the “rude forefathers of the hamlet sleep in their narrow cells,” was, in common with the others in the neighbourhood, strewn with flowers which had been deposited there on the previous Sunday, but their wither appearance more forcibly impressed us with the speedy and relentless decay of all animated nature. However, a very pleasant day was spent, the tea and cake was plentiful and good, and Mr Hargent’s courtesy was marked, and contributed not a little to promote the successful manner in which the annual reunion passed off.