Delwyn Price – Theft from Goytrey Farm 1940

Friday 3rd May 1940 – Theft from Goytrey Farm

Delwyn Price, aged 35, an unemployed Merthyr collier, pleaded not guilty at Pontypool on Saturday to stealing two pairs of brass bearings, a steel casting and an index number plate, with red rear lamp attached, value £3 –5-0, the property of Joseph Edwin Edgar, garage proprietor.

Edgar said Price and another man called him on April 20th at his farm to pick up some sheep. Later he missed the articles from the farm yard.

P C Taylor, Little Mill, said Price denied all knowledge of the theft when he interviewed him at Merthyr, when he found the articles under some hay Price admitted taking them and said “The old man at the farm told me they were of no use”.

Edgar’s father said he did not know the articles were on the yard of the farm.

Superintendent E Casey said Price had been ill for a considerable time.

Price was fined £2

Friday 3rd May 1940

John Davies – Theft of Coal 1899

19th May 1899 – Theft of Coal

John Davies was charged with stealing 1s worth of coal at Goytrey on the 4th May. Defendant pleaded guilty. Arthur Pugh, waggoner, in the employ of Rosser & Payne, said he was taking coal to Nantyderry and left the coal [1cwt] under a hedge where requested by the purchaser, in a sack.

Witness identified the sack produced as the one containing the coal. He asked the prisoner the following day if he had seen anything of the coal, and he said he had not – Margaret Evans, Gwilym Evans and P.c. Davies also gave evidence.

Defendant said he found the coal where it had been placed by the first witness, and took it, not knowing whom it belonged to, but the constable said that at first defendant denied any knowledge of the coal.

This was his first offence and a fine of 10s was imposed.

John Harris 1877

To the Overseers of the Poor of the Parish of Goytrey, the Superintendent of Police for the District of Pontypool and to all whom it may concern

11th August 1877

I, John Harris, now residing at Penpellenny in the parish of Goytrey in the county of Monmouth, beerhouse keeper, and for six months last past having resided at Penpellenny in the said parish of Goytrey

Do hereby give notice that it is my intention to apply at the General Annual Licensing meeting to be holden at the Town Hall, Pontypool on the 25th August next ensuing, for a license to sell excisable liquors by retail, to be drunk or consumed in the house or premises thereunto belonging, situate at Penperllenny:

Said which I intend to keep as Inn, Alehouse or Victualling House

Given under my hand this 3rd day of August in the year of our Lord, one thousand eight hundred and seventy seventy.

18th August 1877

As above:

George Howard for Nantyderry

Oak Beerhouse – Transfer of License 1876

 1st April 1876 – Transfer of License

Mr Greenway made application for transfer of license of the Oak beerhouse, Goytre, from Thomas Smith to Thomas Arthur.

The applicants not giving notice to the superintendent and overseers, the application was not granted.

10th June

Mr Greenway made application for the transfer of a license of the Oak public house at Goytrey.

Supt. M’Intosh said that a former application had been made, and he then made an objection to the transfer on the grounds that the applicant was not a sober man; and he was still of the same opinion.

Mr Greenway said that the applicant had bought the license from Smith and all he required was to sell until the license be out; and if he did not prove himself worthy of his position, then the license need not be renewed.

Col. Byrde said that the magistrates would incur a grave responsibility if they gave a license to a man against the advice of the superintendent.

Rev T. Evans, (rector of Goytre) had known the man for many years and there had been a growing improvement in his conduct for some time.

The application was again refused.

Two Cottages to Let 1877

1st December 1877 – Two Cottages to Let

Two cottages with gardens to let at Nantyderry with an excellent smith’s shop with one cottage and all conveniences.

Also, after Christmas a portion of land for a coal wharf, with part of a good shed

Rents moderate

Apply to:

William Williams, Refreshment House, Nantyderry

Henry Neate – Charge of Assault 1888

16th November 1888 – Charge of Assault

Henry Neate, a signalman, was charged with assaulting Mary Gregory at Nantyderry on the 21st ult.,

Mr T Watkins appeared for the defendant and pleaded not guilty.

Complainant, an infirm old woman, who gave her evidence in a rambling fashion, said on the night prior to the assault, said she was in the Nantyderry Station with the defendant, who formerly lodged with her.

Defendant went out to signal a train, and whilst he was away she looked under a paper he had spread out on a bench, and saw his supper. When he came in he said she had been eating some of his supper, which she denied.

He told her she had better go, and she did so. On the following night she saw the defendant and asked him if she had eaten his supper. He said she had and she denied it. He said he could not take his oath of it, and that, but for her being an old woman he would give her a good shaking.

She told him he had better not, and with that he caught hold of her, forced her against some railings, causing a wound on her arm, and hurting her dreadfully. She was attended by Dr Wood afterwards.

Defendant pushed her all the way from the end of the row to her own house, and when she was on the door, “bleeding in streams,” he got a bucket of water and threw it over her.

Cross-examined: – She was not in such a state on the Saturday night as to forget what time she was in the station.

Mr Watkins: You are rather jovial on Saturday nights?

The Chairman: She doesn’t know what jovial means.

Mr Phillips: That’s to classical an expression for her. Were you drunk on this Saturday night?

Witness: No Sir. All I had was with my family in my own house, and nobody can say more.

Cross-examined: She had not been to Pontypool on the Saturday. She did not turn round in the station and spit meat out of her mouth. She spoke to defendant first about the supper on Sunday night.

Mr Watkins: Didn’t you fetch a bucket of water and tumble over the bucket afterwards?

Witness: Oh! Oh! (Laughter)

Mr Watkins: Don’t faint, we can get some water here.

Witness denied having fetched a bucket of water. She was not drunk on the previous Friday, and had no fall on the previous day.

Mr E.T. Cook, assistant to Dr Woods, produced a certificate from that gentleman, who was unwell and unable to be present. The certificate stated that the writer had attended complainant for contusion of the left ribs and lacerations on the arms, she also complained of pains all over her body.

For the defence, Mr Watkins said the complainant went to the station in a state of drunkenness, which was not at all an unusual state for her. Whilst defendant was out of the station, she commenced to eat his supper, after which she left. On the following night she asked him if he accused her of eating his supper, to which he said he did.

She caught hold of his two hands and spat in his face two or three times. He led her to the house, after which she returned with a bucket of water, which she threw over him. In doing so she fell over the bucket and a step nearby. He could also prove, if necessary, she had had a fall on the previous Friday. – Thomas Cooke, a coachman of Gloucester, formerly of Nantyderry, said that on Sunday night he was standing by his door, with his wife and child, when the defendant passed.

The complainant asked him if she said he had eaten his supper, and he said he did. She denied it again, when the defendant repeated the accusation, and told her not to speak to him again. With that she called him an offensive name, jumped at him, pushed him against the railings, and kicked him twice in succession on the shins. With that defendant caught hold of her arms and led her towards the house, where she spat twice in his face in the most disgusting manner. He put her inside the house and shut the door, after which she came out and threw a bucket of water over him. In doing so she fell over the bucket and a step. Defendant retaliated by throwing the remainder of the contents of the bucket of water, a few drops going on her shoulder and in her face. After that, her poor old husband re-filled the bucket to poor over defendant again.

Complainant: Shame on you Cooke! (Laughter)Complainant was requested to question the witness, but her cross-examination consisted of a series of her former statements, in the course of which she admitted she spat in defendants face.

The Chairman said they could not find that complainant’s statement was proved, especially after the evidence of an independent witness, whose word they had no reason to doubt.

Complainant must have misunderstood the thing altogether, the case would be dismissed.

Mr Watkins asked for the expenses of the witness, who had been subconded to attend from Gloucester.

The Chairman said the complainant was a poor old woman, they could not grant the application.

Complainant: I got nothing to pay anybody, (laughter).

Mr Watkins said he was only acting according to his instructions. He might say that they might have proceeded against complainant on a cross summons had they wished, so that she had been saved that expense.

Sale – Elm Trees 1889

13th October 1899 – Goytrey Properties

Marfell & Poole

Will offer for sale by public auction on Monday 16th August 1899 at 3 o’clock in the afternoon at the Three Salmons Hotel, Usk

Lot 11:

All that Cottage and Garden and piece of Meadow Land known as ELM TREES in the parish of Goytrey, nos. 312 & 313 on the ordinance survey of that parish

The whole containing 1acre 1r 29p

The whole in the occupation of Mr Evan Morgan at a low yearly rental of £6 6s

This property is situate on the main road from Llanover Village to Pontypool, being about 1 mile from the former and within easy access to Nantyderry Station

Auctioneer: Trostrey Court, Usk

Stinchcombe, Mr W – 1940

15th March 1940:

Late Mr W. Stinchcombe – Octogenarian Lay Preacher of Goytrey

The funeral took place at Saron Baptist Church Goytrey, on Thursday last of Mr William Stinchcombe who died at his home, Star Cottage on Monday 4th March aged 86. The Rev. C A Rees officiated assisted by the Rev’s J J Thomas [Llanover], D Lewis, Hanover, and E Symonds, Goytrey.

Mr Stinchcombe was a convinced and most loyal Baptist and was well known as a lay preacher, who in a quiet and unostentatious manner, rendered valuable service to the Churches.

The mourners were: Messrs Will and Charles, sons; Mrs Lily Burgess, daughter: Mrs Stinchcombe, daughter-in–law; Mr Frank Burgess, son-in-law; Mr George Stinchcombe, brother; Leslie and Iris Burgess, grandchildren; Messrs J Berrington, brother-in-law; Harold Stinchcombe & Will Berrington, nephews; Mrs L Burgess; Mr Cyril Waite.

At the house were the widow, Mrs Stinchcombe, Mrs Ada Berrington, sister-in-law, Mrs Annie Waite, Mrs Ethel Burgess, granddaughters.

The bearers were Messrs: Raymond Burgess, Willie Stinchcombe, Tony Stinchcombe and Granville Stinchcombe, grandsons.

Floral tributes were sent by: Sorrowing wife; Will & family; Ruth; Raymold, Charlie and Hilda Cook; brother George and family; Jim and Ada; Annie, Cyril and baby; Wilfred and Helen; Nellie and Topsy; Fred, Hilda and George; Mr & Mrs Price, Monkswood; Arthur & Flo, Llanllowell; Mr & Mrs J Lewis, Llywyn Celyn; Mrs Jones & family, Elm Trees, Mr & Mrs Tresise; Mr & Mrs Messenger; Saron Baptist Church.

March 15th 1940

Well Poisoning 1876

26th August 1876 – ALLEGED WELL POISONING at GOYTRE

The Chairman wished to call the attention of the Superintendent of Police to a proclamation the address of which “Town Hall, Pontypool, had led to the supposition that it had the authority of this Court, and he wished it to be understood that this was not the case.

Mr Phillips was taken unawares, not having known anything of the matter till he had heard it from the chairman.

Mr M’Intosh, “ shall I publicly explain to you? my office is in the Town Hall.

After a few more remarks, in which the word “diabolical” was quoted from the proclamation.

Mr M’Intosh said he could give an explanation if they required it, and continued “Am I to explain now.”

The Chairman:

“You had better defer the explanation.”

Later on during the sitting the magistrate retired and invited Mr M’Intosh into their private room.

On the magistrate’s return into court, the Chairman, {Col. Byrde} said that having ascertained that the bill was issued under instruction there could be no doubt the superintendent was quite justified in issuing the bill, and no reflection could be cast upon him.